![Best Privy Alternatives [2025]](https://blog-cms.openfort.io/uploads/privy_alternatives_3ad4c7d8e3.png)
In the world of web3 applications, seamless user onboarding and secure wallet infrastructure are critical. Privy is a well-known embedded wallet and authentication provider used by many developers. However, depending on your stack and needs, there are several alternatives that may better suit your project. This article explores some of the top Privy alternatives developers are choosing in 2025.
1. Openfort
Openfort (that's us 👋) is an open-source wallet infrastructure platform designed for applications. Unlike Privy, which focuses primarily on onboarding and user identity, Openfort offers a complete wallet stack with SDK support. It supports smart accounts (ERC-4337 and EIP-7702), embedded wallets, and custom authentication—giving developers full control over the user experience.
Openfort is particularly popular among projects building Web3 applications or game-specific onchain economies. With its ecosystem wallet SDK, Openfort enables teams to create self-custodial flows that are composable and extendable.
Key Features
Compared to Privy, Openfort provides a more comprehensive wallet toolkit for developers. Openfort's main product directions include:
Embedded Wallet: Create seamless in-app wallet experiences with support for passkeys, social login, and email authentication.
Smart Account Infrastructure: Full support for ERC-4337 and EIP-7702 smart contract accounts with built-in account abstraction.
Ecosystem SDK: Build your own wallet toolkit with UI components and communication bridge for cross-app wallet experiences.
Multi-Chain Support: Works across all EVM-compatible chains with unified API.
Self-Hosting: Open-source under MIT License, allowing you to build and scale web3 apps on your own infrastructure.
How does Openfort compare to Privy?
Given that Openfort is one of the few open-source wallet infrastructure projects with comprehensive smart account support, it offers significantly more flexibility than Privy for teams building custom wallet experiences. Openfort also boasts a larger developer community focused on web3 wallet gaming and wallet consumer app development.
| Feature | Openfort | Privy |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source Audit code, contribute to roadmap, and build integrations | ✅ | ❌ |
| Self-hostable Host on your own infrastructure (if required) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Self-serve Upgrade Free to try, no mandatory sales calls | ✅ | ✅ |
| Smart Account Support Native ERC-4337 and EIP-7702 implementation | ✅ | ❌ |
| Embedded Wallet UI SDK Complete wallet interface components | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom Auth Providers Bring your own authentication system | ✅ | ❌ |
| Ecosystem SDK Build custom wallet experiences and integrations | ✅ | ❌ |
| Multi-Chain Support Works across all EVM-compatible networks | ✅ | ✅ |
| Developer Community Active open-source community and extensive documentation | ✅ | ✅ |
Why do companies choose Openfort?
There are several main reasons companies prefer Openfort over Privy:
Complete wallet infrastructure: Openfort provides everything needed for wallet development in a single platform, from authentication to transaction management and wallet payments.
Open-source flexibility: Unlike closed-source alternatives, teams can audit, modify, and self-host Openfort to meet their specific security and compliance requirements.
Smart account native: Built from the ground up for smart accounts, making it ideal for web3 wallet gaming, web3 wallet DeFi, and web3 wallet AI agents.
Developer experience: Focused on developer productivity with comprehensive documentation, API reference, and transparent pricing that scales with growth.
2. Dynamic
Dynamic is a wallet and authentication toolkit offering user onboarding with wallet abstraction. It focuses on developer-friendly integrations and a polished UI layer.
How does Dynamic compare to Privy?
Dynamic and Privy are quite similar in their approach, both focusing primarily on authentication and onboarding flows. Dynamic offers a slightly more developer-friendly experience but lacks the advanced wallet infrastructure capabilities that more sophisticated applications require.
| Feature | Dynamic | Privy |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ❌ | ❌ |
| Self-hostable | ❌ | ❌ |
| Smart Account Support | ✅ (Limited) | ❌ |
| Embedded Wallet UI SDK | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom Auth Providers | ✅ (Limited) | ❌ |
| Developer Workflows | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ | ✅ |
Why do companies choose Dynamic?
Clean UI/UX components: Dynamic provides polished interface components that work well out of the box.
Web2 integration: Strong integration capabilities with traditional Web2 authentication methods.
Developer-friendly: Good documentation and straightforward integration process.
3. Thirdweb
Thirdweb offers a broader web3 development suite, including smart contract deployment, authentication, and wallets.
How does Thirdweb compare to Privy?
Thirdweb provides a much broader platform than Privy, including smart contract deployment, NFT tools, and wallet infrastructure. However, it's less specialized in wallet-specific features compared to dedicated wallet infrastructure providers.
| Feature | Thirdweb | Privy |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✅ (Partial) | ❌ |
| Smart Contract Tools | ✅ | ❌ |
| Embedded Wallet UI SDK | ✅ | ✅ |
| No-Code Options | ✅ | ❌ |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ | ✅ |
Why do companies choose Thirdweb?
All-in-one web3 development: Comprehensive suite including contracts, wallets, and deployment tools.
No-code options: Fast setup for teams without extensive development resources.
Broad ecosystem: Wide range of web3 development tools beyond just wallets.
4. Sequence
Sequence is a smart wallet provider geared toward games and consumer apps. It supports seamless wallet UX with social logins and session keys.
How does Sequence compare to Privy?
Sequence offers more advanced smart wallet functionality than Privy, particularly for gaming and consumer applications. While both focus on user experience, Sequence provides better transaction batching and gas abstraction capabilities.
| Feature | Sequence | Privy |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ❌ | ❌ |
| Self-hostable | ❌ | ❌ |
| Smart Account Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| Gaming-Focused Features | ✅ | ❌ |
| Transaction Batching | ✅ | ❌ |
| Gas Abstraction | ✅ | ❌ |
| Session Keys | ✅ | ❌ |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ | ✅ |
Why do companies choose Sequence?
Gaming-native features: Built specifically for web3 wallet gaming with session keys and transaction batching.
Consumer app focus: Optimized for consumer-facing applications with seamless onboarding flows.
Gas abstraction: Built-in gas sponsorship and transaction optimization for better user experience.
5. Coinbase Wallet SDK
Coinbase Wallet SDK allows developers to integrate Coinbase Wallet into their apps, with OAuth-like flows.
How does Coinbase Wallet SDK compare to Privy?
Coinbase Wallet SDK is more limited than Privy as it only connects to existing Coinbase Wallets rather than providing embedded wallet infrastructure. However, it benefits from Coinbase's large user base and brand recognition.
| Feature | Coinbase Wallet SDK | Privy |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ❌ | ❌ |
| Embedded Wallet Creation | ❌ | ✅ |
| Existing Wallet Integration | ✅ | ✅ |
| Brand Recognition | ✅ | ❌ |
| Custom Wallet UI | ❌ | ✅ |
| Multi-Wallet Support | ❌ | ✅ |
Why do companies choose Coinbase Wallet SDK?
Trusted brand: Leverages Coinbase's reputation and existing user base.
Simple integration: Straightforward connection to existing Coinbase Wallets.
App-to-dapp linking: Seamless flow from Coinbase mobile app to web applications.
6. Turnkey
Turnkey offers secure key management via APIs, helping developers build custom custody flows.
How does Turnkey compare to Privy?
Turnkey focuses on the infrastructure layer of key management rather than user-facing wallet experiences. It's more of a building block for custom wallet solutions compared to Privy's ready-to-use interface components.
| Feature | Turnkey | Privy |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ❌ | ❌ |
| Key Management APIs | ✅ | ❌ |
| Embedded Wallet UI | ❌ | ✅ |
| Security-First Design | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom Custody Flows | ✅ | ❌ |
| Ready-to-Use Components | ❌ | ✅ |
Why do companies choose Turnkey?
Security-first approach: Advanced cryptographic primitives and secure key management.
API flexibility: Powerful building blocks for custom wallet architectures.
Enterprise-grade: Built for applications requiring high security standards.
7. Fireblocks
Fireblocks is an institutional-grade custody platform with support for web3 wallets and treasury management.
How does Fireblocks compare to Privy?
Fireblocks targets enterprise and institutional use cases, making it significantly different from Privy's consumer-focused approach. While more secure and feature-rich for enterprises, it's overkill for most consumer applications.
| Feature | Fireblocks | Privy |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ❌ | ❌ |
| Institutional Features | ✅ | ❌ |
| Consumer App Focus | ❌ | ✅ |
| Policy Engine | ✅ | ❌ |
| Compliance Tools | ✅ | ❌ |
| Enterprise Security | ✅ | ✅ |
| Cost | High | Low |
Why do companies choose Fireblocks?
Enterprise security: Military-grade security and compliance features for institutional use.
Advanced policy engine: Sophisticated governance and approval workflows.
Regulatory compliance: Built-in compliance tools for financial institutions.
Building In-House Wallet Product
In the realm of wallet infrastructure, organizations often face the decision of choosing between off-the-shelf solutions like Openfort or Privy and developing an in-house wallet platform tailored to their specific needs. While this option can offer high customization, it comes with its own set of challenges and considerations.
Pros of Building an In-House Wallet Solution
Complete Control: The most significant advantage of an in-house solution is the ability to tailor it precisely to your web3 application needs. This customization can result in a wallet system that aligns perfectly with your existing workflows, brand, and user experience requirements.
No Vendor Lock-in: With an in-house system, you have complete control over your wallet infrastructure without dependency on external providers or their pricing changes.
Custom Features: You can build specific features for your use case, whether it's web3 wallet gaming, web3 wallet DeFi, or web3 wallet AI agents.
Cons of Building an In-House Wallet Solution
Resource-Intensive Development: Developing a wallet solution in-house requires significant time investment in design, development, and testing. This process can divert valuable engineering resources away from your core product development.
Security Expertise Requirement: Building a secure wallet system requires deep cryptographic and blockchain security expertise. This includes not just the initial build but also ongoing threat assessment and response capabilities.
Ongoing Maintenance and Support: Post-deployment, the system will require continuous maintenance to ensure security, performance, and compatibility with evolving blockchain standards. This includes regular updates, patches, and security audits.
Compliance and Audit Challenges: Custom-built wallet systems can face heightened scrutiny from auditors and regulators. Ensuring compliance with evolving regulations can be more challenging compared to using established commercial solutions.
Scalability Concerns: As your application grows, the in-house wallet solution might need significant re-engineering to scale effectively, which can be a resource-intensive process.
Time to Market: Building a production-ready wallet infrastructure can take months or years, potentially delaying your core product launch.
Is Openfort right for you?
Here's our (short) sales pitch.
We're biased (obviously), but we think Openfort is the perfect Privy replacement if:
You're looking for a developer-focused solution that will grow with your application for years ahead. With Openfort, you get much more than just authentication and onboarding—you get smart account infrastructure, ecosystem wallet SDK, embedded wallets, and comprehensive wallet development tools.
You value transparency and control. We're open source under the MIT license with full self-hosting capabilities.
You want to try before you commit. Openfort is self-serve with transparent pricing and comprehensive documentation.
Check out our developer documentation and API reference to learn more.
If you have any questions or want to schedule a product demo, you can get started with our team of experts.