Best Dynamic Alternatives [2025]

Dynamic is one of the leading wallet infrastructure providers used by teams looking to add embedded wallets and authentication into their Web3 apps. However, if you're evaluating wallet providers for your application or platform, there are strong alternatives worth considering — particularly if you're looking for open-source, extensibility, and greater developer control.

Here are the top alternatives to Dynamic in 2025:

1. Openfort

Openfort (that’s us 👋) is an open-source wallet infrastructure stack and ecosystem SDK. Designed for developers building scalable Web3 experiences — particularly in gaming and consumer apps — Openfort enables teams to spin up their own wallet SDKs, embedded wallets, and custom auth flows, all while maintaining user sovereignty.

Openfort is not just a wallet SDK — it’s a protocol, open-source stack, and developer toolkit.

Key features

Compared to Dynamic, Openfort offers greater flexibility and transparency by being fully open-source and extensible:

• Ecosystem SDK: Build your own wallet SDK with @openfort/ecosystem-js, including React hooks, EIP-1193 injection, and popup bridges.
• Embedded Smart Wallets: Fully ERC-4337 compatible with support for EIP-7702. Runs on any EVM chain.
• Modular Auth Layer: Use any auth provider — Auth0, Firebase, custom OIDC — and manage permissions across sessions.
• Customizable UI: Plug-and-play frontend components with full UI override support.
• Self-Host or Use Openfort Cloud: For teams needing privacy, sovereignty, or compliance with data residency.

How does Openfort compare to Dynamic?

Feature	Openfort	Dynamic
Open Source	✅ MIT-licensed, auditable, extensible	❌ Not open-source
Self-Hostable	✅ Yes	❌ No
Custom Wallet SDK	✅ Yes, create your own SDK	❌ Closed SDK only
Smart Wallet Support	✅ ERC-4337, EIP-7702	✅ ERC-4337
Chain Agnostic	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Pluggable Auth	✅ Any OIDC provider	✅ Email/SMS/Auth0
UI Control	✅ Full override support	❌ Limited customization
Gas Sponsorship	✅ Native bundler + paymaster infra	✅ Supported
Open Identity Layer	✅ Multi-session, permissioned	❌ Opaque session system
Use Case Focus	Gaming, consumer apps	Dapps, crypto apps

Why do teams choose Openfort over Dynamic?

• Open-source & self-hostable: Teams who need data sovereignty or want to deeply customize wallet logic opt for Openfort.
• Ecosystem-first: Unlike single-purpose SDKs, Openfort is designed to let you build and own your wallet ecosystem.
• Developer-first architecture: Focused on hooks, modular APIs, and zero vendor lock-in.

Explore Openfort on GitHub · Documentation

2. Privy

Privy is an embedded wallet and auth solution that makes it easy to onboard users with Web2 credentials. It’s particularly popular in consumer apps.

✅ Pros:

• Great UX for Web2-to-Web3 onboarding
• Supports both embedded and external wallets

❌ Cons:

• Closed source with no self-hosting option
• Limited flexibility for custom wallet SDKs

3. Sequence

Sequence offers wallet-as-a-service for game and consumer apps, with account abstraction and Unity SDK support.

✅ Pros:

• Gaming SDKs available
• Native AA support and paymaster infra

❌ Cons:

• Closed-source architecture
• Limited ability to customize wallet UI and auth logic

4. Thirdweb

Thirdweb is a developer toolkit for smart contracts and wallets with a focus on simplifying Web3 development.

✅ Pros:

• Good smart contract abstractions
• Offers embedded wallets and AA support

❌ Cons:

• Opinionated SDKs and abstractions
• Not ideal for highly customized ecosystems

5. Turnkey

Turnkey provides secure key management APIs for teams looking to build programmable wallets.

✅ Pros:

• API-first design for backend key control
• Strong security model

❌ Cons:

• Lacks frontend wallet UI and UX components
• Requires deeper integration effort

6. Fireblocks

Fireblocks is an institutional-grade custody platform focused on security and compliance.

✅ Pros:

• Strong security for regulated entities
• Trusted by financial institutions

❌ Cons:

• Expensive and enterprise-focused
• Not designed for embedded or consumer wallets

7. Coinbase Wallet SDK

Coinbase Wallet SDK is built to integrate dapps with Coinbase Wallet via mobile linking and deep linking.

✅ Pros:

• Easy to integrate with Coinbase Wallet
• Popular with existing Coinbase users

❌ Cons:

• Not suitable for embedded or white-labeled wallets
• Requires user to have a Coinbase Wallet account

FAQs

1. Why would I use Openfort over Dynamic? Openfort is open-source and lets you build your own wallet SDKs. If you want full control over auth, UI, and wallet infra — or prefer to self-host — Openfort is a better fit.

2. Can I migrate from Dynamic to Openfort? Yes, Openfort provides migration guides and a modular SDK design so you can gradually replace pieces of your stack.

3. Is Openfort production-ready? Yes. Openfort supports ERC-4337, EIP-7702, and powers real-world gaming and consumer apps today.

4. Does Openfort support email or social login? Yes — Openfort is auth-agnostic. You can plug in Auth0, Firebase, or your own OIDC system easily.

Looking for a developer-first, open, and extensible smart-wallet stack? Explore Openfort → Docs | GitHub