Dynamic was acquired by Fireblocks in 2025, bringing it under the umbrella of the leading enterprise digital asset infrastructure provider. While this acquisition adds enterprise security credibility, it raises questions about Dynamic's future direction—will it continue serving startups and developers, or shift toward Fireblocks' traditional enterprise customer base?
Why Developers Look for Dynamic Alternatives
Since the Fireblocks acquisition, developers have been evaluating Dynamic alternatives for several reasons:
- Enterprise pivot concerns: Fireblocks serves large enterprises; Dynamic may de-prioritize startup/developer needs
- Open-source sovereignty: Dynamic's infrastructure is proprietary with no self-hosting option
- Native smart account gaps: Dynamic relies on third-party integrations for advanced smart account features
- Signing performance: Dynamic's 2850ms signing latency is significantly slower than alternatives
- Strategic uncertainty: Acquisition changes product roadmap and pricing dynamics
What to Look for in a Dynamic Alternative
| Criteria | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Independence | Acquired companies may change direction; independent vendors have aligned incentives |
| Smart Account Support | Native ERC-4337/7702 vs third-party integrations affects feature depth and reliability |
| Signing Performance | Sub-100ms signing is critical for real-time UX; Dynamic's 2850ms is very slow |
| Open Source | Self-hostable infrastructure provides audit capability and escape hatch |
| Multi-chain | EVM-only vs multi-chain (Solana, Cosmos) support for your use case |
What are the Best Dynamic Alternatives?
The best Dynamic alternatives in 2026 are Openfort, Turnkey, and Thirdweb.
- Openfort is the top choice for developers who need native smart account features, open-source infrastructure, and sub-100ms signing without vendor lock-in
- Turnkey excels at low-level programmable signing with the fastest performance (50-100ms)
- Thirdweb offers an all-in-one platform if you want bundled contract and wallet tools
Note: Several competitors have also been acquired—Privy is now part of Stripe, Web3Auth is part of MetaMask, and Sequence is part of Polygon Labs.
1. Openfort
Openfort (that's us 👋) is an open-source wallet infrastructure solution that provides powerful wallet capabilities to abstract crypto complexity for both users and developers. Our platform allows developers to plug and play any signer (including OpenSigner) and contract they prefer, simplifying everything from cross-app ecosystems and AI agents to fintech and DeFi.
Why Choose Openfort Over Dynamic
- If you're concerned about Fireblocks enterprise pivot, Openfort is independent and developer-focused
- If you need faster signing (125ms vs Dynamic's 2850ms) for real-time applications
- If you want native smart accounts with built-in session keys, gas sponsorship, and policy engines
- If you want open-source sovereignty with self-hostable infrastructure
Comparison Table: Openfort vs. Dynamic
| Feature | Openfort | Dynamic |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✅ OpenSigner (MIT) | ❌ Proprietary |
| Signing Speed | 125ms median | 2850ms median |
| Smart Wallets | ✅ Native (4337, 7702) | ⚠️ Third-party |
| UI Approach | Headless + Components | Polished Widget |
| Authentication | Any OIDC Provider | Built-in / Socials |
| Pricing | Free 1,000 MAUs | $249/mo (5k MAU) |
| Vendor Lock-in | ❌ None (Exportable) | ⚠️ High (Fireblocks) |
| Gas Sponsorship | ✅ Native Policy Engine | ⚠️ Basic |
| Parent Company | Independent | Fireblocks |
| Server Wallet | ✅ Backend Wallet | ✅ Server Wallet |
| Permission Model | On-chain (session keys) | Off-chain (basic) |
Scaling Considerations
- Openfort: Free tier with 1,000 MAUs and 500 transactions. Usage-based pricing scales transparently.
- Dynamic: Starts at $249/month for 5,000 MAUs. Post-acquisition pricing may change.
Performance comparison: Openfort's 125ms median signing is 22x faster than Dynamic's 2850ms—critical for gaming, trading, and real-time applications.
Why developers choose Openfort
Developers choose Openfort for native smart account power (gas sponsorship, batching, automation), open-source sovereignty, and independence from enterprise acquisition dynamics.
2. Turnkey
Turnkey offers secure, programmable key management built by the team that created Coinbase Custody. Turnkey provides the fastest TEE-based signing infrastructure available.
Why Choose Turnkey Over Dynamic
- If you need the fastest possible signing (50-100ms vs Dynamic's 2850ms)
- If you want to build your own wallet experience with complete control
- If you're building AI agents with policy-controlled autonomous signing
- If you prefer usage-based pricing (per signature)
Comparison Table: Turnkey vs. Dynamic
| Feature | Turnkey | Dynamic |
|---|---|---|
| Level | Infrastructure API | Product SDK |
| Signing Speed | 50-100ms | 2850ms |
| Flexibility | ✅ Build anything | ⚠️ Widget constraints |
| Verifiable | ✅ Cryptographic proof | ❌ |
| Pricing | $0.10/signature | MAU-based |
| UI Components | ❌ Build your own | ✅ Pre-built widget |
| Server Wallet | ✅ Server Signing | ✅ Server Wallet |
| Permission Model | Off-chain (strong) | Off-chain (basic) |
Recent Updates (2026)
- Policy-controlled signing for AI agents
- Verifiable infrastructure with cryptographic proofs
- Clients include Spectral Labs, Legend Labs
Why developers choose Turnkey
Teams choose Turnkey to build their own wallet experience with maximum performance and control. It's infrastructure, not a product.
3. Privy (Now Part of Stripe)
Privy was acquired by Stripe in June 2025. Privy focuses on high-conversion onboarding flows and now integrates with Stripe's Bridge stablecoin platform.
Post-Acquisition Considerations
- Stripe ecosystem: Deep integration with payments and stablecoins
- Potential lock-in: Building on Privy now means building on Stripe's ecosystem
- Consumer focus: Still optimized for consumer app onboarding
Comparison Table: Privy vs. Dynamic
| Feature | Privy | Dynamic |
|---|---|---|
| Signing Speed | 175ms | 2850ms |
| Onboarding | Best-in-class | Strong |
| Pricing | $299/mo (2.5k MAU) | $249/mo (5k MAU) |
| Parent Company | Stripe | Fireblocks |
| Multi-chain | EVM, Solana, BTC | EVM, Solana, Cosmos |
| Stablecoin Integration | ✅ Bridge | ❌ |
| Server Wallet | ✅ Server Wallet | ✅ Server Wallet |
| Permission Model | Off-chain (strong) | Off-chain (basic) |
Why developers choose Privy
Teams choose Privy for superior conversion rates and Stripe payment ecosystem integration.
4. Thirdweb
Thirdweb offers a full stack of web3 tools including embedded wallets, smart accounts, contract deployment, and payments.
Why Choose Thirdweb Over Dynamic
- If you want an all-in-one platform (contracts, wallets, indexing, payments)
- If you prefer a generous free tier
- If you want ecosystem wallets for multi-app identity
Comparison Table: Thirdweb vs. Dynamic
| Feature | Thirdweb | Dynamic |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Full Stack Platform | Wallet Focus |
| Smart Accounts | ✅ Native | ⚠️ Third-party |
| Contract Tools | ✅ Extensive | ❌ |
| 700+ Chains | ✅ | ✅ |
| Pricing | Generous free tier | $249/mo |
| Independence | ✅ Independent | ❌ Fireblocks |
Why developers choose Thirdweb
Developers choose Thirdweb for a "one-stop-shop" approach—if you need contracts, indexing, and wallets together.
5. Web3Auth (Now Part of MetaMask)
Web3Auth was acquired by MetaMask/Consensys. Web3Auth provides MPC-based authentication infrastructure.
Post-Acquisition Considerations
- MetaMask integration: Expect deeper MetaMask ecosystem integration
- MPC latency: Slower signing (~500ms+) due to MPC ceremony
- Lowest cost: Still the cheapest option at $69/month
Comparison Table: Web3Auth vs. Dynamic
| Feature | Web3Auth | Dynamic |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Auth & Keys | Full Wallet UI |
| Signing Speed | ~500ms (MPC) | 2850ms |
| Pricing | $69/mo (3k MAU) | $249/mo (5k MAU) |
| Parent Company | MetaMask/Consensys | Fireblocks |
| UI | Build your own | Pre-built Widget |
Why developers choose Web3Auth
Teams choose Web3Auth for the lowest cost social login infrastructure.
6. Sequence (Now Part of Polygon Labs)
Sequence was acquired by Polygon Labs for $125M in January 2026. Sequence specializes in gaming wallet infrastructure.
Post-Acquisition Considerations
- Polygon focus: Part of Polygon's "Open Money Stack" for stablecoin payments
- Gaming strength: Only verified EVM wallet on Unity Asset Store
- Chain priority: May prioritize Polygon ecosystem
Comparison Table: Sequence vs. Dynamic
| Feature | Sequence | Dynamic |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Gaming | General Purpose |
| Game SDKs | ✅ Unity, Unreal | ❌ |
| Marketplaces | ✅ Built-in | ❌ |
| Parent Company | Polygon Labs | Fireblocks |
Why developers choose Sequence
Game studios choose Sequence for gaming-specific features and Unity/Unreal SDKs.
Recommendation by Use Case
| Use Case | Recommended Alternative |
|---|---|
| Need open-source sovereignty | Openfort |
| Real-time apps (gaming, trading) | Openfort or Turnkey |
| All-in-one platform | Thirdweb |
| AI agents / automation | Turnkey or Openfort |
| Gaming with Unity/Unreal | Sequence |
| Lowest cost social login | Web3Auth |
| Stripe payment integration | Privy |
| Enterprise security priority | Stay with Dynamic |
Conclusion
Dynamic remains a solid choice if you prioritize polished UI widgets and enterprise security backing from Fireblocks.
However, if you need faster signing performance (125ms vs 2850ms), open-source sovereignty, native smart account features, or want to avoid enterprise acquisition dynamics, Openfort provides the infrastructure you need.
The embedded wallet market has consolidated significantly. For teams that value independence and long-term flexibility, open-source alternatives are more important than ever.
Get started with Openfort — 1,000 MAUs free, no credit card required.